top of page
Search

Edible Landscaping VS Agroforestry






As more people become interested in growing their own food, new methods of gardening and agriculture are emerging. Two such methods are edible landscaping and agroforestry, both of which aim to incorporate food production into natural environments. While these terms may seem similar, there are some key differences between the two.



Edible Landscaping


Edible landscaping is the practice of incorporating edible plants into the design of a garden or landscape. This can include fruit trees, berry bushes, herbs, and vegetables. The goal of edible landscaping is to create an aesthetically pleasing landscape that also provides a source of fresh, healthy food.


Edible landscaping can be done on a small or large scale, and can include traditional garden beds as well as raised beds, containers, and vertical gardens. Some people even incorporate edible plants into their ornamental gardens, blending them in with flowers and other decorative plants.


Agroforestry



Agroforestry, on the other hand, is a land-use management system that involves the integration of trees with crops and/or livestock. Agroforestry practices involve the strategic placement of trees and shrubs to create a more diverse and sustainable agricultural system. Agroforestry can include alley cropping, where trees are planted in rows with crops grown in between, or silvopasture, where trees are integrated into pastureland to provide shade and shelter for livestock.

Agroforestry practices are designed to be more sustainable and to provide multiple benefits beyond just food production. For example, trees can help prevent soil erosion, improve water quality, and sequester carbon, which can help mitigate the effects of climate change.


Differences between Edible Landscaping and Agroforestry


While both edible landscaping and agroforestry involve incorporating food production into natural environments, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Scale: Edible landscaping can be done on a small scale, such as in a backyard or on a balcony, while agroforestry is typically done on a larger scale in agricultural settings.


2. Design: Edible landscaping is focused on incorporating edible plants into a landscape or garden design, while agroforestry is focused on the integration of trees with crops and/or livestock.


3. Maintenance: Edible landscaping requires more maintenance than agroforestry, as plants are often grown in traditional garden beds that require regular watering, weeding, and pruning. Agroforestry, on the other hand, is designed to be more sustainable and to require less maintenance once established.

4. Goals: Edible landscaping is primarily focused on food production, while agroforestry is focused on creating a more sustainable agricultural system that provides multiple benefits beyond just food production.


In conclusion, while both edible landscaping and agroforestry involve incorporating food production into natural environments, they are distinct practices with different goals and methods. Edible landscaping is focused on incorporating edible plants into a landscape or garden design, while agroforestry is focused on the integration of trees with crops and/or livestock to create a more sustainable agricultural system. Both practices offer unique benefits and can be a rewarding way to grow your own food while also creating a beautiful and sustainable environment.

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page